On Mon, 20 Jun 2005 19:13:12 +0000 (UTC), Steven Sullivan
Post by Steven SullivanPost by Governor SwillPost by Steven SullivanPost by Governor SwillAnimals lacks the scope of TW,
you mean 'length'.
Hm.. No, I'm sure he wrote 'scope'.
but effectively, it's 'length'
If you're going to be so picky.
Post by Steven SullivanPost by Governor SwillIt really is too bad it was written to be performed on a stage. It's
much better that way. Had he not had the visuals in mind, it could
have been a much shorter and more effective single disc.
You mean, 'should'.
I think 'could' sounds somewhat hopeful while 'should', in this
context, seems critical.
PF had got the rep for 'concept' albums. The Wall went farther by
telling a particular story. Thus, it had a wider emotional scope.
That said, any good story editor could have not only cut it by a third
at least, the cuts would have vastly improved the work as a whole.
For example, leaving in WSWDN and cutting Vera would have made for a
better build up and flow of the story. A music editor would have
helped too. Many of the tracks seem too long as they tend to
musically wander but not as effectively in earlier work.
I remember though that WYWH didn't sell as well as DSOM, and Animals
didn't sell as well as WYWH. Perhaps a motivation to increase his
audience caused Roger to reach out with his last, large chunk of
greatness and create something *too* big.
Bedwarmer
--
"If you find a message from myself offensive, inappropriate or
disruptive, please ignore it. If you don't know how to ignore
a posting, complain to me and I will demonstrate." -- Wicked Nickname